On this day, March 15th,
one hundred years ago, Tsar Nicholas II abdicated. This followed several weeks
in which the capital, Petrograd, had slid towards anarchy. The war was not
going well, and food supplies to the city had broken down, leading to shortages
and severe price inflation. This in turn had led to strikes and demonstrations,
which had soon turned violent. Most alarming of all, sections of the Petrograd
garrison refused to supress the rioters, but instead joined the crowds on the
streets. Police stations were attacked, and armed police who fired on rioters
from the rooftops were lynched. Meanwhile the Tsar was away at the Front, and
did not realise the seriousness of the situation until it was far too late. His
only action was to suspend the Duma, the Russian Parliament, which at this
stage was dominated by conservatives and moderate liberals, with hardly any
left-wing representation. But the Duma refused to disperse. There were demands that the Tsar should go. Finally Nicholas,
finding that he was supported by nobody, not even his generals, tamely
surrendered and abdicated.
Nicholas offered the crown to his brother,
Grand Duke Michael; but Michael, feeling his accession would lack legitimacy
unless he was recognised by the Duma, rejected the crown. After four centuries,
Tsarism ceased to exist.
Into the gap left by the end
of Tsarism stepped two different bodies. The Duma proclaimed a “Provisional
Government”, headed by a liberal nobleman, Prince Lvov, with a radical lawyer,
Alexander Kerensky, as its dominant personality. The second body was the
“Soviet (that is, council) of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies”, which arose
spontaneously in the city, and to which increasingly the masses looked for
leadership. For the moment, the Soviet was dominated by moderate Socialists who
were prepared to co-operate with the Provisional Government.
There was general rejoicing, both in Russia
and amongst her allies, as the Provisional Government freed all political
prisoners, ended press censorship and announced future elections for a
Constituent Assembly. The main reason this amity and optimism did not last was
that the decision was also taken to keep Russia in the war. Over the next few
months the army disintegrated and German forces advanced further into Russia. The
food supply to Petrograd became ever worse as anarchy spread throughout the
Russian countryside. Violence in the streets increased. The path was set for
the Bolshevik seizure of power in the autumn.
The Bolshevik Party had played no part in
the fall of the Tsar. Lenin was in Switzerland (and was caught entirely by
surprise by the fall of the Tsar), Trotsky was in New York and Stalin in exile
in a remote part of Siberia. They now all returned to Petrograd and worked to
seize control of events.
These events are known as the
“February Revolution”. In fact most of them took place in March under our
calendar, but at the time Russia still followed the antiquated “Julian”
calendar, thirteen days behind the West. Historians deal with this problem by
indicating that the dates they cite are “Old Style” (O.S.) or “New Style”
(N.S.) The date of March 15th, given above, is N.S.
An American cartoon of the fall of the Tsar. Note the whip Nicholas is holding. It is labelled "German Influence", reflecting a widespread (but incorrect) belief that Nicholas's German-born Empress, Alexandria, was pro-German, and their friend Rasputin might have been a German agent.
An American cartoon of the fall of the Tsar. Note the whip Nicholas is holding. It is labelled "German Influence", reflecting a widespread (but incorrect) belief that Nicholas's German-born Empress, Alexandria, was pro-German, and their friend Rasputin might have been a German agent.
No comments:
Post a Comment